Othello Importance Of Act I Essays - Othello, Iago, Roderigo

Othello: Importance Of Act I William Shakespeare's Othello is a tragic play consisting of five acts. Although each act is not of equal importance, each serves a distinct role that affects the quality of the play in its entirety. Removing any act would therefore greatly diminish the final product of this play; consequently, reducing the play's appeal to the audience. Since Act I satisfies several essential purposes, removing it would be a mistake. Ultimately, we would no longer be seeing Othello the way Shakespeare had intended us to. First of all, Act I serves as an introduction. As a result of Act I, we get a feel for the setting, the characters, and prior events that are required to thoroughly appreciate this play. Without receiving this vast amount of information, unfortunately the rest of the play does not have the same impact. For example, it is in Act I that we learn of Othello's ethnic as well as military background. Although the Moor finds himself the target of racial comments, the impression we get of him, throughout Act I, is one of simplicity combined with dignity and honesty. In Scene I, we are also informed of Othello and Desdemona's recent marriage. The situation regarding Othello's choice of lieutenant is another important event described in the first scene of Act I. Iago had attempted to bribe his way into this position, but Othello chose Cassio, a Florentine, whose knowledge of war was great despite his lack of experience. All of these events occurred prior to the start of the play, but are invol ved in the development of the play; therefore, they are recalled for our purposes in Act I. Removing the first act of Othello would consequently prevent us from realizing that these events had indeed taken place, making it quite difficult to understand the meaning of the play. In addition, the removal of Act I from Othello would weaken the audiences feelings of anguish for the characters. The deaths of Othello and Desdemona would be considered less tragic because the downfall of these characters would be to a lesser extent. In Act I, both Othello and Desdemona are portrayed at their greatest moment. Othello is depicted as a general of utmost ability. News of an imminent attack on the island of Cypress sends Venice into a state of emergency, so Othello is sent for. Othello's good reputation with the Duke and Senators convince us of his capabilities. Othellos high status is also demonstrated when he and Brabantia approach the Duke in scene III. Although Brabantia outranks Othello, the Duke initially acknowledges Othello by saying, Valiant Othello, we must straight employ you / against the general enemy Ottoman.( ). Similarly, Desdemonas finest qualities are also revealed in Act I. The senators daughter is depicted as a beautiful, elegant, young lady. Her pur eness and innocence provide a refreshing outlook toward life after witnessing Iagos intentions. Act I also shows Brabantios high influential power in Venice. Desdemonas courage to marry a man whom her father does not approve of represents the strength of Desdemonas love for Othello. These impressions are required to classify Othello as a tragic play. Without seeing these characters at such a height, in the beginning, their deaths may not be considered tragic in the end. Ultimately, without Act I the downfall of both Othello and Desdemona would not be as noticeable. Othello would not be a play of such caliber without Act I. The first act of the play is designed to set the play into action. In order to remain in control of Roderigos money, Iago must justify his actions. He decides to plot against both Othello and Cassio, introducing the motive for the play: Cassios a proper man; let me see now, To get his place and to plume up my will In double knaverry How, how? Lets see: After some time, to abuse Othellos ear That he is too familiar with his wife. This soliloquy reveals Iagos evil character to the audience and predicts what is to come. Despite Iagos reasoning to Roderigo that revenge is the motive behind his actions, we soon realize that Iago has a motiveless maliciousness; doing evil for his own enjoyment. In addition, the prominent theme of deception is

Seatbelts Laws Are Beneficial- Disagree Essay Example

Seatbelts Laws Are Beneficial Seatbelts Laws Are Beneficial- Disagree Essay Seatbelts Laws Are Beneficial- Disagree Essay The article that is being review is called Primary Seat belt Enforcement Laws Are Beneficial. The writer of this article is Kathyrn O’Leary Higgins. She explains on the logical thinking behind why seatbelt Torahs are really good to have on. Her chief logical thinking of this article is to explicate and commend you for sing this step that will so easy salvage many motor vehicle residents from crash-related deceases and hurts. She strongly believes that people who do non have on at that place seatbelt are more likely to acquire in to auto accidents. She did a great occupation seting this article together with all the good information and great points to each thought. The writer Kathyrn does give good credibleness throughout her article. Her vocabulary was good aimed toward college pupils. She did non nevertheless look in the way on how seatbelt Torahs can be unbeneficial. Although her subject is really problematic many do non hold with the thought that seatbelt enforcement Tora hs are good. Seatbelt Torahs may be the figure one defence against motor vehicle hurts and fatalities . The writer besides mentions that. These drivers. who choose non to clasp up. be given to exhibit multiple high hazard behaviours and are more often involved in clangs. Yet. that thought can be really problematic. Many people would extremely differ. merely because you aren’t have oning your seat belt doesn’t many you are more likely to drive loony. In add-on. Many people believe that it should be your ain determination if you want to have on a seat belt or non. Yes there may be many instances where a seat belt has saved persons lives. But there are besides many accidents where a seat belt has killed a person’s life or earnestly injured the person. For an illustration on how a seat belt killed an person. there was one accident wear the auto caught on fire and the person could non acquire the seat belt unattached which kept him trapped in the auto and died from the fire. Besides many people get injured from seat belts. They get bad thorax and shoulder hurts. There was one paper that mentioned on how the female parent left her girl in the auto while she was holding a conversation with a friend. She had a bad feeling and deceided to halt and look into on her girl. She knew something was non right when seen that her girl wasn’t traveling about. She opened the door to see her girl with two seat belts wrapped around her cervix. She was strangulating at that place and as they tried to un wrap the seat belts they got tighter. until they eventually got something to cut the seat belts and acquire her loose. That’s another great illustration on how seatbelts aren’t ever at that place for merely safety. Some people even believe that they can drive faster if have oning their seat belt. they believe if they crash they are safe due to the seat belt. which is pathetic. If this merely sounds perfectly absurd. inquire yourself: would you drive with greater attention if – one all right day- you woke and discovered that person c ut off your seat belt? If the reply is yes. so it means you aren’t driving every bit safely as you can. right now with your seat belt on ( Kumar. Navin. 1 ) . Yes in many instances seat belts cut down the sum of accidents that happen. and they decrease the figure of deceases. But they cause people to drive faster and more recklessly. doing more accidents and increasing the figure of people who die. Seatbelt Torahs are besides hypocritical. The writer references. Although oppositions to primary enforcement place belt Torahs claim that nonuse is a personal pick and affects merely the person. the fact is that motor vehicle hurts and human deaths have a important social cost. Why is it that a individual in a vehicle has to have on a seat belt yet a motorcyclist doesn’t have to have on a helmet? The good jurisprudence is a misdemeanor of a person’s freedom. Seat belts are at that place if a individual chooses to have on one. and those who want to can have on their seat belt. but those who don’t want to shouldn’t be forced to have on one. If some people think others are put on the lining their life because they aren’t have oning their seat belt so that’s their sentiment. Our belief is that it’s up to you to do your ain determinations. The authorities shouldn’t be coercing anyone to make anything for their ain good. In a free society. if person is injured or killed because they freely choose to utilize or non utilize their seat belt. that is a person’s calamity. as it is with other freely chosen hazards in life. It’s non at all sensible. Citations Higgins. Kathyrn O’Leary. Primary Seat Belt Enforcement Laws Are Beneficial. Cars in America. Ed. Andrea C. Nakaya. Detroit: Greenhaven Press. 2006. Opposing Point of views. Rpt. from Testimony of Honorable Kathryn O’Leary Higgins. Board Member. National Transportation Safety Board. 2009. Gale Opposing Point of views In Context. Web. 4 Feb. 2013. hypertext transfer protocol: //ic. galegroup. com. gary. libproxy. ivytech. edu. allstate. libproxy. ivytech. edu/ic/ovic/ViewpointsDetailsPage/ViewpointsDetailsWindow? failOverType= A ; query= A ; prodId=OVIC A ; windowstate=normal A ; contentModules= A ; mode=view A ; displayGroupName=Viewpoints A ; limiter= A ; currPage= A ; disableHighlighting=true A ; displayGroups= A ; sortBy= A ; source= A ; search_within_results= A ; action=e A ; catId= A ; activityType= A ; scanId= A ; documentId=GALE % 7CEJ3010429245 Kumar. Navin. Can safety ordinances kill you? How safe are seat belts and seatbelt Torahs? Digital Bits Skeptic. Copyright. 2012. Web 4 Feb 2013. hypertext transfer protocol: //www. dbskeptic. com/2009/06/21/can-safety-regulations-kill-you-how-safe-are-seabelts-and-seatbelt-laws/ hypertext transfer protocol: //www. sallycphotography. com/archives/2005

Compare and contrast the use of the death penalty around the world Essay

Compare and contrast the use of the death penalty around the world before explaining why you believe it will or will not be abolished in the near future - Essay Example As at present, it was also used to deter other persons from committing more crime in the society. The crimes deemed worse by the society absolutely received the death penalty. In western countries, capital crimes like murder, treason and or espionage received the capital punishment that is a death penalty for the accused. In Middle Eastern countries, sexual crimes that included rape, incest or adultery and sodomy were the worst crimes and the criminal received death penalty. Other authorities recognized drug trafficking, human trafficking and religious crimes as serious crimes that deserve the death penalty. Most armed forces around the world termed any crime committed by a soldier like disobedience, spying as a capital crime punishable by death penalty. Since the past forms of capital punishment were more inhumane, there was a need for more humane forms of punishments and in the 18th century, most countries adopted modern methods to execute the death penalty. The guillotine was introduced in France, electric chair in Louisiana State, death by firing squad and lethal injection in most western countries. The Death penalty is in use in almost all countries in the world. In the recent past, most countries have done away with the penalty. Statistics shows that 103 countries have abolished the use of the penalty, 6 countries only use it for crimes committed in extraordinary circumstances like during war, 50 countries have not used it for almost 10 years the penalty is under suspension. 36 countries use the penalty to date; it is in their law and practice. In Algeria, the death penalty is for crimes like espionage, treason and attempts to overthrow the government, destruction of countries territory, terrorism, massacres and manslaughter, participation in rebellious movements. Other crimes include torture, kidnapping, counterfeiting and aggravated theft.